Search This Blog

Customs Law

The postings of a customs lawyer in Chicago on the state of customs law and international trade law. Important Disclaimer: None of this is legal advice, don't act on it. Don't ascribe these statements to my law firm, its partners or clients. Don't steal from my blog. I wrote it, I own it. But, feel free to link to me. Also, under the rules regulating speech by attorneys, this blog may be construed as lawyer advertising. I am the sole party responsible for the content.

At ICPA

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

March 09, 2009

Semi-live tweeting from ICPA today and tomorrow. Follow along at www.twitter.com/customslawblog.

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

March 04, 2015

For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

March 30, 2009

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc. There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud. Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it. Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount. Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme. But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism? It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly. It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000. Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

April 07, 2024

Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise. There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade. Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...