Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise. There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade. Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Comments
I was in the office today. OK, I'm busted.
In my head, I was still fighting up the hills between Sonoma and Napa.
In reality, today was the first time I could post that picture.