Note to Rita Moreno: You are an American!

[Note: Yes, I screwed this up. Read the comments. Now, excuse me while I kiss this guy.]

In West Side Story, the Puerto Rican character Anita (played by Ms. Moreno) sings that she wants to be an American (in mixed 6/8 3/4 time). It turns out that she is. At least as far as the U.S. Court of International Trade is concerned.

OK, maybe that is an over statement.

In Puerto Rico Towing & Barge Co. v. United States, the ultimate issue is whether a port in Puerto Rico is a "port of the United States." The case involves the U.S.-flagged M/V Honcho, which operates out of San Juan.

Under U.S. law, there is a 50 percent duty imposed on the value of vessel repairs performed abroad on U.S. flagged vessels. One exception to this rule is for vessels that have no landed at a U.S. port for two years. Seeking to invoke this exception, the Honch argued that San Juan, Puerto Rico is not a U.S. port.

The problem for the plaintiff in this case is that 19 USC sec. 1401(h) defines "United States" as including "all Territories and possessions of the United States except the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Johnston Island and the Island of Guam." Other statutes and regulations also define Puerto Rico as part of the United States and San Juan as a port. Thus, the exception does not apply.

And now on to a monsterquest where I raise questions but do not answer them:

Why are the Virgin Islands exempt? Is it because we bought them from Denmark rather than won them from Spain?

Is there any reason to hang on to Kingman Reef, which is a largely submerged atoll?

If the highest peak on Johnston Island is only 44 feet above sea level, is it fair to call it "Summit Peak?"

Comments

Anonymous said…
Larry -

No answer about Kingman Reef of Johnston Island, but when the US purchased the then Danish West Indies in 1917, part of the agreement was to leave the then-current DWI tariff in effect for 100 years. Thus a different tariff and keeps the renamed US Virgin Islands "outside the customs territory."

What will happen in 2017 is anybody's guess, and there'll be a lobbying battle about it for certain.

Amazing day - replied to both of your posts.
Aug 29, 2009, 5:12:00 PM
Larry said…
And I much appreciate the replies. I'm reading the Nat'l Fisheries case for my next post.
Aug 29, 2009, 5:42:00 PM
Ralph said…
I thought she said. "I want to be in America, everything free in America" - that is, "in". not "an"
Aug 30, 2009, 7:30:00 PM
Larry said…
Darn it! Lyrics are here:

http://www.elyrics.net/read/w/west-side-story-lyrics/america-lyrics.html
Aug 30, 2009, 9:42:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

Image
For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...
Read more

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...
Read more

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

Image
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise.  There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in  Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States  et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade.  Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Read more