David Pogue, You Better be Right

I have had half a Treo 650 for the past 9 months or so. The keyboard got marinated in a skim latte with sugar. Don't ask; I covered this before. So, I have been stuck mostly with Graffiti to enter text. It has been a major pain. But, I have been unable to purchase a replacement. I did not want to waste $150 to cancel my Sprint contract. But, I could get a new 650 for more than $150 less as a new customer at another carrier. Then, I thought, maybe a Blackberry. They are generally cheaper but I don't like the form factor on some and I really like my Treo. The Motorola Q got my attention for a while, then I played with some phones using Windows Mobile 5.0 and decided I like the Palm OS better.

Finally, Sprint came out with the 700p. The price was enough to give me pause.

Then, I watched David Pogue's video review of the 700p. I like Mr. Pogue. In fact, he is my hero. With the possible exception of CIT Judge, I can't imagine a job more fun than his. My side gig as tech columnist for the Chicago Bar Association's magazine, The Record, is fun. But, it is not the New York Times. I don't have every major and minor tech company begging me to review their latest gizmo. Rather, I beg them to loan me stuff for review. I also don't get to go to trade shows (other than the ABA's Tech Show). I don't work from home. When Jim Coates retires from the Tribune, I am hoping for a call. But, I am not holding my breath.

So, David Pogue. I listened to you and I put my trust in you. I went out and renewed my Sprint contract for two years to get a very small break on a very expensive phone. Tomorrow, I will synch it up with my office computer and, hopefully, be as bowled over as you were.

Sprint, I have a question for you. Why is it that you treat me, a long-term customer in mid-contract, like a pariah? Why do I get the worst possible deal on a new phone? A person walking in off the street would have paid $150 less than me for the same phone. Is there a class action lawyer out there looking into price discrimination in the mobile phone industry? I had a couple crazy options to buy the phone cheaper including creating a new line (which meant giving up my phone number for at least 30 days) or canceling and coming back without a contract (which would net out at no savings). In the end, I felt trapped by my contract with Sprint. I told them so on the phone and in person. No one would budge. I threatened to cancel and get a 700w from Verizon. No one cared. In the end, I did exactly what they knew I would do--I renewed my crazy contract because I need a phone and want this one.

I may be a sap regarding my contract. If so, I have no one to blame but myself. But if this phone is less than perfect, I have David Pogue to blame. You hear me, Mr. Pogue?

Comments

David Pogue said…
I hear you!

I'm telling you, you'll like it! :)

--Pogue
Jun 25, 2006, 11:33:00 PM
Anonymous said…
No different with any other carrier - I jumped ship from Verizon after 8 long and expensive years. Did they care? Of course not. Did they even try to keep me as a customer? Not as much as asking me if there was wnything that they could do.
Jun 26, 2006, 8:08:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

Image
For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...
Read more

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...
Read more

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

Image
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise.  There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in  Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States  et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade.  Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Read more