Hybrid Sheep and the Lacey Act

The Lacey Act, as you likely know, prohibits the international movement of plants and animals that were harvested illegally. Typically, a violation involves a company that imported wood or wood products for use in production or for resale. Less commonly, by which I mean never until just now, does the violation involve the importation of parts of wild mountain sheep from Kyrgyzstan as part of a plot to clone the sheep to produce breeding males to make hybrid giant sheep for private hunting in Montana. That real live plot, recently noted in a Department of Justice press release, sounds like the hobby or side hustle for the villain in a James Bond movie. 

Thanks to Tom B. for the tip and the nudge to do this update.

The crazy facts are that the owner of an "alternative livestock ranch" in Montana violated the Lacey Act when he conspired with others to import "parts" of Marco Polo argali sheep.  These are among the largest sheep in the world and are native to the Pamir Mountains of central Asia. According to DOJ, they can weight more than 300 pounds and have horns that span five feet.



The idea was to use the imported samples to clone a male Marco Polo and then use that male to impregnate ewes of other species, creating a "giant" hybrid sheep for "captive hunting."  This was not just an idea, the ranch owner got as far as having actual cloned sheep embryos and produced a single pure-bred male Marco Polo named "Montana Mountain King." That ram's semen was actually used to artificially inseminate ewes. 

It is not clear how the Lacey Violation occurred. Possibly, the killing and/or butchering for export in Kyrgyzstan was illegal under local or international law. More likely, the problem for the rancher-turned-defendant is that the species ovis ammon, of which the Marco Polo is a subspecies (ovis ammon polii), is listed on Appendix II of the Convention on the International Traffic in Endangered Species (CITES). Appendix II lists species that are not yet recognized as threatened with extinction but need protection from unregulated trade to prevent that risk. Importing Appendix II animals or products derived from them requires an export permit from the source country. Presumably, that was not obtained. 

Here is a related law-school hypothetical for you: What if they did this Jurassic Park-style with an already extinct, and therefore not endangered, species? This is not too crazy of an idea. People seem to be actively working toward de-extinction for a mammoth and a thylacine ("Tasmanian tiger"). At least initially, it seems those creatures or hybrid (e.g., half mammoth-half elephant) would be unregulated. Or, they may fall into some more generic regulation prohibiting the keeping of "exotic" or invasive species. Whatever, when it is possible for me to have a pet dodo (raphus cuculattus), I'm in.

Also, while I am thinking of CITES, do not smuggle birds, even if they are cereal mascots.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl
Read more

Target on Finality

Image
In the last post , about the Federal Circuit’s very important decision on due process and allegations of evasion of antidumping duties, I made a snarky, offhand comment that the government believes “liquidation is magic.” That was in the context of the government arguing that Customs’ liquidation of entries mooted an appeal, thereby taking away the importer’s right to further judicial review. I said that knowing full well that I still needed to write this post summarizing Target Corp. v. United States in which Target made what I want to be a valid and righteous argument that Customs’ improper liquidation of entries at a favorable rate of antidumping duty prevents the Court of International Trade from ordering Customs to collect the legally applicable duties. But it turns out that while liquidation is an important legal step, in at least one unusual circumstance it is not sufficiently powerful to overcome the full force of an Article III court. Understanding this case requires a lot
Read more

CAFC: EAPA Process Really Does Violate Due Process

Image
Hot on the heels of my complaining about how the EAPA law and process is stacked against importers, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued an important decision that will have a major impact on how those cases work. If you are unfamiliar with evasion cases under the Enforce and Protect Act and how Customs and Border Protection handles them, go back and look at these two posts: Part 1 , Part 2. Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States , is the decision in an evasion case against Royal Brush involving pencils allegedly transshipped from China through the Philippines. Customs determined that there was evasion of an antidumping duty order based in part on evidence that was not disclosed to Royal. Specifically, Customs sent a representative to the facility in the Philippines to photograph the interior and provide a report. Customs refused to disclose all the photographs to Royal. Moreover, CBP's report concluded that the facility did not have sufficient capacit
Read more