News You Might Want

Been slow on the news front. Here are some things that crossed my virtual desk recently:

Customs and Border Protection has July 17th as the date it will start enforcing that rule that any bulk residue in instruments of international traffic entering the U.S. must be properly manifested and entered. CBP has published a FAQ on the topic.

There will be a change to the textile rules of origin under the DR-CAFTA. According to a statement on the USTR web site:
We approved a series of changes to the Agreement’s rules-of-origin for textile and apparel goods that will facilitate regional trade and integration. These changes will expand opportunities under the CAFTA-DR Agreement and encouraging a vibrant textile and apparel supply chain in the Western Hemisphere to effectively face the challenge that Asian competitors represent. We also agreed to increase the cumulation limits to encourage greater integration of regional production through limited reciprocal duty-free access with Mexico and Canada to be used in Central American and Dominican Republic apparel, as called for under the Agreement.
The Bureau of Industry and Security has issued another notice stating that cloud computing providers are not subject to EAR so long as they are not providing anything subject to EAR. This relates to the infrastructure providers. Keep in mind that a public or private cloud user might well violate the EAR if he or she is not careful. For example, if I were to put EAR controlled technical data in a corporate cloud and let engineers in China access it, there might be a violation. That is very different from just creating and maintaining the system in which that might occur. Here is the decision.

Counterfeit iPads have hit the market. Imaging the technical resources necessary to accomplish that. If only that power were used for good, not evil.

$381,000 in your spare tire is way better than finding a $5 bill in your jeans pocket. Except, of course, for the going to jail part.

Comments

MattDC said…
Thanks for the heads-up on IPad counterfeiting, and the forces of evil. We haven't heard anything from you recently on the superhero front.
Feb 27, 2011, 3:24:00 PM
Nioxin Reviews said…
Ipad is not as bad as its sound
Feb 28, 2011, 8:59:00 AM
Anonymous said…
Regarding the changes to the DR-CAFTA textile rules of origin, here's what I wrote on my blog http://nationaltextile.blogspot.com/

While we still do not have the final text of the modifications to the textile and apparel rules of the U.S.-Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement ("CAFTA-DR") announced in yesterday's National Textile Association daily news blog, we understand that the changes are all ones that we have been expecting for some time. In summary, as we understand the agreement, modification will be made to five provisions of CAFTA-DR:


•The current rule requiring originating elastomeric yarn even in the case of a fabric that is on the short supply list will be modified to allow non-originating elastomeric yarn in the case of a fabric on the short supply list (the requirement for originating elastomeric yarn for other fabrics will remain unchanged),

•The current rule which requires that sewing thread originate has a technical error that permitted monofilament sewing thread to be non-originating, this will change to require all sewing thread, monofilament and plied, to originate, this is a change the National Textile Association has advocated for almost from the beginning of CAFTA-DR;

•A certain technical correction will be applied to the definition of women's sleepwear of woven fabric,

•Certain waistband rib of the same construction of the collar and cuff of a sweatshirt will be allowed to be non-originating as is currently the case for the collar and cuff, and

•While currently the short supply provision applies to only the single textile component that determines the tariff classification of a garment, this will change so that sewing thread, narrow elastic fabric, pocketing, and lining fabrics, if not available in the region, can be added to the short supply list, but only after undergoing the short supply procedures now in place to assure that only those items truly not available in the region are added to the list.

Further, as reported, the quantity of Mexican (and potentially Canadian) woven fabric used in CAFTA-DR under the cumulation provision was increased in accordance with the text of the agreement which calls for re-visiting the cumulation level, however, since current usage of cumulation is well under the cap, this is not expected to have any serious effect on trade in the near term.

As we noted yesterday, there may be a significant lapse in time between this ministerial agreement and implementation. We have further confirmed that the changes will not go into effect until all the CAFTA-DR partners have made the necessary legislative changes (no "rolling implementation"). While it is impossible to predict how long it will be before the changes are implemented, past experience suggestes it may be several months and that the trade will have ample notice of the changes before they go into effect.
Mar 3, 2011, 1:42:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

Image
For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...
Read more

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...
Read more

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

Image
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise.  There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in  Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States  et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade.  Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Read more