Knife Fight Part II: The Senate Cuts In

Boy, Customs can't seem to catch a break. This issue about the treatment of assisted opening knives probably struck Customs and Border Protection as another simple ruling revocation of which no one would take note. Turns out, that is not the case.

Now, the Senate has stepped in with an amendment to some a Homeland Security appropriations bill. The amendment proposes to modify the Switchblade Knife Act to exempt from it:
a knife that contains a spring, detent, or other mechanism designed to create a bias toward closure of the blade and that requires exertion applied to the blade by hand, wrist, or arm to overcome the bias toward closure to assist in opening the knife.
You can see the text of the amendment in the Congressional Record here. The amendment was introduced by Senator Hatch along with Senators Coryn and Pryor. Sen. Hatch's comments begin on page S7304 which may or may not be here. Senator Hatch's press release, though, is here. The House needs to deal with this issue before the amendment becomes law, assuming the President signs it. I learned that from School House Rock.

This makes me wonder how folks are feeling at CBP. Several big policy initiatives have been stymied by public response and congressional action. Most noteable was the effort to do away with first sale valuation. The proposal for uniform rules of origin seems to have withered as well. Grumbling also continues with respect to Importer Security Filings and the Lacey Act (the latter having been foisted on CBP by Congress). Now Congress steps in to protect the right to import (note that this only relates to imports) knives with an assisted opening mechanism (albeit with a bias toward staying closed). Plus the agency continues to be without an Obama-appointed Commissioner.

I've been accused of being anti-agency, and I am not. I'm not making any judgment about these things. I'm just pointing out that it seems that the places where Customs seems to have invested some policy effort have generated more push-back than the agency may have expected. This knife business certainly surprised me.

I know people inside the agency visit this blog. Anyone want to drop an anonymous comment and let me know if I am wrong?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Larry -

The BIG problem with Customs today is that the baby boomers are all retiring, leaving NO institutional memory. Kids looking to make a name for themselves are coming up with all kinds of "new" ideas, most of which were tried and failed a generation ago. "First sale" was a screw-up in the first place, but you can't put 10 lbs of manure in a 5-lb sack - the battle was lost before it began. Some other "hero" decided it was time to reinterpret the Switchblade Knife Act, again, with NO look st institutional memory. And don't get me started on "Chertoff's Folly" - the border wall.

-Retired Customs officer with 42 years experience
Jul 14, 2009, 4:40:00 PM
Larry said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jul 15, 2009, 2:25:00 PM
Larry said…
See, that is the interesting perspective I like to hear.

Anyone else?

Note: The previous versions of this comment was removed to give me more time to learn to both spell and type.
Jul 16, 2009, 11:09:00 AM
Matt said…
-- Or it may simply have been Hatch and Cornyn's effort to come fully prepared for the Sotomayer hearings, the Judiciary Committee's version of the Jets vs. the Sharks. Now that the hearings are finished, we'll find out if there's any "bias toward closure."
Jul 17, 2009, 1:42:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

Image
For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...
Read more

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...
Read more

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

Image
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise.  There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in  Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States  et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade.  Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Read more