CITBA Winter Luncheon Meeting

If you are in DC February 10, please come to the Customs and International Trade Bar Association luncheon meeting.  Here are the details:

CUSTOMS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE BAR ASSOCIATION

WINTER LUNCHEON AND SEMINAR

 

Date:               February 10, 2009

Place:               Willard Inter-Continental

                        1401 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

                        Washington, D.C.

Time:               Reception:       12:00 p.m.

                        Luncheon:       12:30 p.m.

                        Seminar:          2:00-3:30 p.m.

 

Luncheon Speaker:      To Be Announced                             

                                               

Afternoon Seminar:    “ITC and WTO Approaches to Injury Determinations in Subsidy Cases”

                                               

            Panel:  Moderator:  Joseph Dorn, Esq., King & Spalding

                        John Greenwald, Esq., WilmerHale

Jim Lyons, Esq., General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission

                        David Yocis, Esq., Associate General Counsel, USTR

Jorge Miranda, Economist, King & Spalding (formerly WTO Rules Div.)

           

            Price:   Luncheon and Seminar

                        Members:                    $95

            Non-Members:            $85

                        Luncheon or Seminar Only:    

                        Members:                    $65

                        Non-Members:            $75

 

Government Attorneys ($10 reduction)

 

R.S.V.P. with Checks Payable to “CITBA” by February 2, 2009 to:

 

Beth Ring

Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A.

551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1100

New York, N.Y. 10176

Tel: 212-883-1300

Fax: 212-883-0068

Email: nkoosau@strtrade.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

Image
For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...
Read more

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...
Read more

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

Image
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise.  There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in  Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States  et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade.  Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Read more