News of Limited Interest

I took a few days to go sailing. My crew and I went from our home port north of Chicago to Racine, WI and then on to Milwaukee. On the way back, we stopped in Kenosha. Just a bit of rain and one day of no wind. Other than that, a good trip.

Kenosha turned out to be a surprise. I was expecting a somewhat depressed factory town but found a vibrant lakefront community with new museums and plenty of restaurants. If you happen to be in the area, don't miss Frank's Diner for breakfast. Just get there early.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Larry, I think all the news here is of limited interest. In fact, I'm pretty sure you could find more people interested in sailing and good restaurants than in Customs law.
Just out of curiousity, what kind of boat do you sail?
Aug 1, 2007, 1:19:00 PM
Larry said…
Nick:

A retroactive good luck on the bar.

My boat is an old 25' Catalina. Its in decent shape but still only marginally comfortable for three grown men, two of whom snore. If you are familiar with the layout, I sleep in the aft bunk below the starboard side of the cockpit. It is a bit like sleeping in a phone booth turned on its side.
Aug 1, 2007, 8:42:00 PM
Larry said…
One more thing, I have a picture of my boat docked in Chicago here.
Aug 1, 2007, 8:51:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Nice. I know nothing about sailing but I love boats and the water. What little sailing I've done was at summer camp. I'm more of a canoeing/ski boating/fishing kind of guy. Never was any good at knots.
Aug 2, 2007, 10:58:00 AM
Anonymous said…
Which port? Used to sail out of Great Lakes when I was in Chicago.

24' Farrier Tri-maran before you ask.
Aug 28, 2007, 12:48:00 PM
Larry said…
Wow, speedy boat. I sail out of Waukegan.
Aug 28, 2007, 9:19:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Sailed in and out of Waukegan a few times...may have passsed you at some point
Aug 29, 2007, 12:09:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruling of the Week 2015.8: Old Jersey and Pitcairn Island

Image
For today's ROTW, I set out looking for a ruling dealing with some far off and preferably warm location. Turns out that, with the exception of coastwise transit issues, there are no Customs and Border Protection rulings involving Pitcairn Island or any of several Pacific Ocean microstates including Tuvalu , Niue , and Kiribati . Pitcairn Island What I did find is an interesting question about the country of origin marking for products of the Bailiwick of Jersey Island, Channel Islands. The ruling is HQ 561938 (Mar. 18, 2002). For those of you who may not know, Jersey is an island off the coast of Normandy, France. It is an independent international actor and not part of the U.K. although the U.K. is responsible for its defense and external relations. Also, the Queen is the Head of State in her capacity as "the Crown in Right of Jersey." It is, according to the U.S. Department of State, a " Crown Dependency " along with the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick o...
Read more

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl...
Read more

Ninestar and UFLPA Exhaustion

Image
Exhaustion is a key doctrine in administrative law. When applicable, it requires that a party unhappy with an agency’s determination complete the administrative appeal process before turning to the courts for judicial review. Requiring exhaustion typically promotes judicial efficiency by ensuring that disputes are resolved at the agency and, if they are not, that there is a complete record of the agency process. Exhaustion also ensures that the judiciary respects the executive agencies and their expertise.  There are, on the other hand, times when the courts will find that exhaustion is not necessary or appropriate. Such is the case in  Ninestar Corporation et al. v. United States  et al., a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade.  Ninestar is also interesting because it is one of the first cases in the CIT involving the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, known as UFLPA. In my hiatus from active blogging, I missed the rise of UFLPA as a major compliance t...
Read more