tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154253.post5752171654863214763..comments2024-03-20T00:33:13.961-05:00Comments on Customs Law: What About the Battery?Larryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13659537105506728479noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154253.post-73759660095578811582010-06-27T21:46:56.290-05:002010-06-27T21:46:56.290-05:00To extend James' comment slightly:
Now contem...To extend James' comment slightly:<br /><br />Now contemplate the situation in which:<br /> (a) each reasonably plausible combination of base unit + accessories receives its own SKU,<br /> (b) the goods are entered into and stored in an FTZ, wherein they are kitted (into various SKUs) as ordered, and<br /> (c) the completed SKUs are withdrawn from the FTZ for consumption, as the orders are shipped.Leroy F. Bervennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154253.post-79490229539801128372010-06-18T10:19:45.546-05:002010-06-18T10:19:45.546-05:00So now this makes things interesting. If I am a re...So now this makes things interesting. If I am a retailer, and I have multiple "Package" deals that could theoretically comprise all of the various sets of my product, and if I marketed them as sets and sold them as sets - would that meet the definition set by this court.... <i>hmmm</i> makes you thinkJamesnoreply@blogger.com