tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154253.post3123651066086506646..comments2024-03-20T00:33:13.961-05:00Comments on Customs Law: Chris Hayes Recants, I GuessLarryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13659537105506728479noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154253.post-72178332595697664492007-10-03T11:36:00.000-05:002007-10-03T11:36:00.000-05:00Wait, wait, wait. You are "increasingly convinced"...Wait, wait, wait. You are "increasingly convinced" because some Canadians had a "day of action?" That's your evidence?<BR/><BR/>This is why "progressives" have so much trouble actually moving the agenda in the United States. If the NAFTA revolution comes, it will be incrementally made using regulations and Federal Register notices. All in plain sight. It won't be announced as a grand program.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154253.post-82294704838260873302007-10-03T10:48:00.000-05:002007-10-03T10:48:00.000-05:00I don't like conspiracy theories, myself. And I do...I don't like conspiracy theories, myself. And I don't think the SPP is a conspiracy. But in the same way that, say, the Energy Department or DHS might pursue deleterious policies partly obscured by the complexities of bureaucracy, so, too, is SPP, I'm increasingly convinced. So I haven't recanted. I'm just more convinced that the /substantive agenda/ of the SPP is more objectionable than I had previously believed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com