Golden Tchotchkes

I am making progress on my continuing effort to catch up. Evidence of that is that I am about to do a post on a case from June: Salem Minerals Inc. v United States.

The merchandise at issue in this case is a little hard to picture. It consists of small glass vials containing a clear fluid with specks of gold leaf and topped with a small figurine. Happily, the plaintiff has a web site that includes pictures of its products, including this one:


The gold leaf fragments are "very small in weight per vial" and are not worked or formed during production. The anionic solution in the vial serves to magnify the appearance of the gold leaf. The themed caps are cast of tin alloys and may be electroplated with 18k gold. The gold leaf constitutes about 38% of the value of the imported products.  The vials are sold to tourists rather than through fine jewelry stores or other high-end outlets.

Customs and Border Protection classified these products under Heading 7114 as "Articles of goldsmiths' . . . wares . . .: Of other precious metal whether or not plated or clad with precious metal." The importer protested that classification are asserted that the goods are better classified in Heading 7115 as"Other articles of precious metal . . .: Other . . . Other: of gold, including metal clad with gold."

The Court of International Trade said that the issue boils down to the sole question of the meaning of the term "articles of goldsmiths' wares." After looking at a number of dictionary definitions for goldsmiths and smiths in general, the Court concluded goldsmiths' wares are generally articles of some utilitarian or decorative use made through the application of a skilled craft-person. Also, Chapter 71, Note 10 limits the scope of the heading to, for example, articles of household, office or religious use and jewelry. Further, in an interesting historical note, the Court pointed out that gold leaf is produced by goldbeaters, who form a distinct class of artisans from goldsmiths. Thus, the gold leaf is not a goldsmith's wares. And, as a result, the gold leaf vials do not constitute goldsmiths' wares because the gold flecks have not been worked by a goldsmith beyond the simple beaten state.

Props to Judge Aquilino for the turn of the phrase: "It is just a tchotchke, not something like creative exemplars of Explanatory Note 71.14."

Comments

Sarah said…
I think my question really is, “does that constitute jewelry at all?” And if so, does it apply to those laws?
Aug 1, 2012, 1:57:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CAFC Decision in Double Invoicing Case

The Federal Circuit has issued a decision on the merits in United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.  There had been a previous decision on jurisdiction, which was followed by a trial at the Court of International Trade and then this appeal on the substance. The initial issue is whether Inn Foods' invoicing practice amounts to fraud.  Inn Foods had been receiving an invoice from growers in Mexico that had a relatively low sales prices on it.  Subsequent to entry, Inn Foods created a second invoice at something more similar to market value, retaining the original invoice number, and paid at that higher amount.   Superficially, this looks like a standard-issue double-invoicing scheme.  But, in the age of reconciliation, is it really more like a provisional pricing mechanism?  It might have been possible to make that argument had Inn Foods adjusted its entries accordingly.  It didn't and the loss of revenue was approximately $624,000.  Based on testimony and evidence indicating both knowl
Read more

Target on Finality

Image
In the last post , about the Federal Circuit’s very important decision on due process and allegations of evasion of antidumping duties, I made a snarky, offhand comment that the government believes “liquidation is magic.” That was in the context of the government arguing that Customs’ liquidation of entries mooted an appeal, thereby taking away the importer’s right to further judicial review. I said that knowing full well that I still needed to write this post summarizing Target Corp. v. United States in which Target made what I want to be a valid and righteous argument that Customs’ improper liquidation of entries at a favorable rate of antidumping duty prevents the Court of International Trade from ordering Customs to collect the legally applicable duties. But it turns out that while liquidation is an important legal step, in at least one unusual circumstance it is not sufficiently powerful to overcome the full force of an Article III court. Understanding this case requires a lot
Read more

CAFC: EAPA Process Really Does Violate Due Process

Image
Hot on the heels of my complaining about how the EAPA law and process is stacked against importers, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued an important decision that will have a major impact on how those cases work. If you are unfamiliar with evasion cases under the Enforce and Protect Act and how Customs and Border Protection handles them, go back and look at these two posts: Part 1 , Part 2. Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States , is the decision in an evasion case against Royal Brush involving pencils allegedly transshipped from China through the Philippines. Customs determined that there was evasion of an antidumping duty order based in part on evidence that was not disclosed to Royal. Specifically, Customs sent a representative to the facility in the Philippines to photograph the interior and provide a report. Customs refused to disclose all the photographs to Royal. Moreover, CBP's report concluded that the facility did not have sufficient capacit
Read more